There’s always a reason but why is North Korea so bellicose? Internally there are signs of the economy becoming less centralised and surely the regime just wants to be left alone and to continue its despotic reign? Why attract the censure of the world?

The answer is THAAD. THAAD has only been developed in the last ten years. It has been deployed in the UAE and Turkey and now, last month, in South Korea. Hitherto North Korea had South Korea within missile range and vice versa – not entirely satisfactory but an equilibrium. THAAD protects South Korea making North Korea vulnerable and impotent.

THAAD is a Terminal High-Area Defence system. Here is what it looks like.

US Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) system equipment is seen at a former golf course in the southern county of Seongju, South Korea.

THAAD intercepts and destroys incoming ballistic missiles, both conventional and nuclear. It changes the balance of power. Kim Jung Un has lost his leverage and needs to establish a new threat to protect his regime from destabilisation or destruction by foreign powers. Now I understand why his apparent madness in developing long range missiles is in fact a logical response to protect himself.

It is ironic that a system that can only be used as a defence from attack can actually destabilise a region. China opposed the deployment of THAAD in South Korea, realising that it would stimulate the development of missiles with longer ranges by the north. A solution to this dangerous escalation would be for the south to relinquish THAAD in exchange for some partial disarming in the north. It would make the word a safer place but it would put South Korea back in Kim Jun Un’s sights.

One thought on “THAAD”

  1. This is the anniversary of Lepanto . The Turks ,Islam,Greek renegates weren’t the only losers. The knights of St John had a near death experience at the battle and in two future sieges.The Austrians and their Austro Slav allies were in a long long war that would last into the 1700s. The Americans are in a similar situation in Asia and public sentiment I suspect would be on the side of buggering off and letting China sort it without our blood and treasure but rather doubt our bellicose regime will allow. Back to Chesterton. And Cervantes,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *